Passage Workspace

Matthew 9:16

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Matthew 9:16

16 No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.

Chapter Context

Matthew 9 is a biographical gospel chapter in the New Testament that explores themes of sacrifice, obedience, judgment. Written during the late first century CE (c. 80-90 CE), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Written when Christianity was separating from Judaism following Jerusalem's destruction.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-38: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it demonstrates God's faithfulness despite human unfaithfulness. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Matthew and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Matthew 9:16

16 No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse.

Analysis

Jesus offers a parable about cloth and garments: 'No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse' (ουδεις δε επιβαλλει επιβλημα ρακους αγναφου επι ιματιω παλαιω). Unshrunk cloth (αγναφος, new/unprocessed) sewn onto old garment will shrink when washed, tearing away from the weakened old fabric and creating worse damage. The illustration teaches that new covenant realities cannot be patched onto old covenant forms. Jesus isn't reforming Judaism but inaugurating something fundamentally new. Attempting to combine the two destroys both. This has profound implications: Christianity isn't Judaism 2.0 but the fulfillment that transcends and replaces the preparatory system.

Historical Context

First-century garment repair was common in subsistence economies where clothing was valuable and carefully maintained. Everyone understood the problem of mixing new and old fabric. Jesus' illustration would have been immediately comprehensible. The deeper issue addressed Jewish Christian attempts to maintain old covenant practices (circumcision, food laws, festivals) while following Jesus. The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15) wrestled with this question. Paul's letters insist that Gentile Christians need not adopt Jewish customs. The temple's destruction (AD 70) forced recognition that old covenant forms had ended. The parable warned against syncretism that would destroy both Judaism's integrity and Christianity's newness.

Reflection

  • What old covenant or religious forms do Christians sometimes try to patch onto new covenant realities?
  • How does this parable help us understand the relationship between Old and New Testaments?
  • In what ways might we be trying to put 'new wine in old wineskins' in contemporary church practice?

Cross-References

Original Language

οὐδεὶς G3762 δὲ G1161 ἐπιβάλλει G1911 ἐπίβλημα G1915 ῥάκους G4470 ἀγνάφου G46 ἐπὶ G1909 ἱματίου G2440 παλαιῷ· G3820 αἴρει G142 γὰρ G1063 τὸ G3588 +9