Passage Workspace

Job 5:7

A focused desk for reading, commentary, cross-references, original language notes, and your own observations.

Chapter Interlinear Verse Page

Job 5:7

7 Yet man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward.

Chapter Context

Job 5 is a wisdom dialogue chapter in the Old Testament that explores themes of truth, obedience, discipleship. Written during the patriarchal period (literary composition later), this chapter should be understood within its historical context: Ancient wisdom traditions often wrestled with the problem of suffering and divine justice.

The chapter can be divided into several sections:

  1. Verses 1-5: Introduction and setting the context
  2. Verses 6-12: Development of key themes
  3. Verses 13-20: Central message and teachings
  4. Verses 21-27: Conclusion and application

This chapter is significant because it contributes to the biblical metanarrative of redemption. When studying this passage, it's important to consider both its immediate context within Job and its broader place in the scriptural canon.

Verse Study

Job 5:7

7 Yet man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward.

Analysis

Eliphaz declares 'man is born unto trouble, as the sparks fly upward' (adam le-amal yullad, אָדָם לְעָמָל יוּלָּד). The word amal (עָמָל) means toil, trouble, or misery—human existence inevitably includes suffering. The comparison to sparks flying upward (bene reshef, בְּנֵי־רֶשֶׁף, literally 'sons of flame') suggests natural inevitability. This observation contains wisdom: we live in a fallen world where suffering is universal. However, Eliphaz uses this truth to minimize Job's specific suffering and suggest he should simply accept it without complaint.

Historical Context

The phrase reflects ancient wisdom about the human condition under the curse (Genesis 3:17-19). Eliphaz correctly identifies that suffering is part of fallen existence but wrongly concludes that Job should therefore not question his particular affliction. The verse appears in Eliphaz's counsel that Job should seek God and accept correction (5:8, 17), assuming Job's suffering is divine discipline.

Reflection

  • How do we balance accepting that suffering is part of fallen existence with legitimately questioning specific injustices?
  • What is the difference between Eliphaz's fatalism and biblical acceptance of God's sovereignty?

Cross-References

Original Language

כִּֽי H3588 אָ֭דָם H120 לְעָמָ֣ל H5999 יוּלָּ֑ד H3205 וּבְנֵי H1121 רֶ֝֗שֶׁף H7565 יַגְבִּ֥יהוּ H1361 עֽוּף׃ H5774