For though ye had smitten the whole army of the Chaldeans that fight against you, and there remained but wounded men among them, yet should they rise up every man in his tent, and burn this city with fire.
For though ye had smitten the whole army of the Chaldeans that fight against you, and there remained but wounded men among them, yet should they rise up every man in his tent, and burn this city with fire—this hyperbolic statement emphasizes the absolute certainty of God's decreed judgment. Even in the impossible scenario where Judah defeated Babylon's entire army, leaving only anashim medukkaim (אֲנָשִׁים מְדֻקָּרִים, wounded/pierced men), those wounded soldiers would still accomplish Jerusalem's destruction.
The imagery is deliberately extreme to make the theological point: Jerusalem's fall does not depend on Babylonian military superiority but on divine decree. God has determined judgment; therefore, no human strategy or military victory can prevent it. The phrase ish be'oholo (אִישׁ בְּאָהֳלוֹ, every man in his tent) pictures incapacitated soldiers barely able to stand, yet they would still succeed because God ordained it.
This teaches a crucial theological principle: when God decrees something, it becomes metaphysically certain regardless of apparent impossibilities. Conversely, when God promises deliverance, no enemy force can prevent it (Romans 8:31). The question is never human strength versus human strength, but whether we align with or resist God's revealed will. Judah's tragedy was fighting against God's purposes rather than submitting to His discipline.
Historical Context
This hyperbole recalls similar prophetic statements emphasizing divine sovereignty: Isaiah declared that even if Israel were 'as the sand of the sea,' only a remnant would return (Isaiah 10:22). Amos proclaimed that fleeing from a lion only to meet a bear illustrates the impossibility of escaping God's judgment (Amos 5:19). Jeremiah used stark imagery throughout his ministry to penetrate hardened hearts. Tragically, Judah's leaders ignored these warnings, trusting in fortifications, alliances, and temple rituals while persisting in covenant unfaithfulness.
Questions for Reflection
How does this hyperbole illustrate the futility of resisting God's decreed judgment?
What is the difference between trusting God's power to deliver us and presuming He must deliver us despite persistent disobedience?
In what ways might we be fighting against God's purposes rather than submitting to His discipline?
Related Resources
Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.
Analysis & Commentary
For though ye had smitten the whole army of the Chaldeans that fight against you, and there remained but wounded men among them, yet should they rise up every man in his tent, and burn this city with fire—this hyperbolic statement emphasizes the absolute certainty of God's decreed judgment. Even in the impossible scenario where Judah defeated Babylon's entire army, leaving only anashim medukkaim (אֲנָשִׁים מְדֻקָּרִים, wounded/pierced men), those wounded soldiers would still accomplish Jerusalem's destruction.
The imagery is deliberately extreme to make the theological point: Jerusalem's fall does not depend on Babylonian military superiority but on divine decree. God has determined judgment; therefore, no human strategy or military victory can prevent it. The phrase ish be'oholo (אִישׁ בְּאָהֳלוֹ, every man in his tent) pictures incapacitated soldiers barely able to stand, yet they would still succeed because God ordained it.
This teaches a crucial theological principle: when God decrees something, it becomes metaphysically certain regardless of apparent impossibilities. Conversely, when God promises deliverance, no enemy force can prevent it (Romans 8:31). The question is never human strength versus human strength, but whether we align with or resist God's revealed will. Judah's tragedy was fighting against God's purposes rather than submitting to His discipline.