Jeremiah 18:5

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying,

Original Language Analysis

וַיְהִ֥י H1961
וַיְהִ֥י
Strong's: H1961
Word #: 1 of 5
to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)
דְבַר Then the word H1697
דְבַר Then the word
Strong's: H1697
Word #: 2 of 5
a word; by implication, a matter (as spoken of) or thing; adverbially, a cause
יְהוָ֖ה of the LORD H3068
יְהוָ֖ה of the LORD
Strong's: H3068
Word #: 3 of 5
(the) self-existent or eternal; jeho-vah, jewish national name of god
אֵלַ֥י H413
אֵלַ֥י
Strong's: H413
Word #: 4 of 5
near, with or among; often in general, to
לֵאמֽוֹר׃ came to me saying H559
לֵאמֽוֹר׃ came to me saying
Strong's: H559
Word #: 5 of 5
to say (used with great latitude)

Analysis & Commentary

Another formulaic phrase marks divine interpretation of the object lesson: "Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying." God will now explain the theological significance of what Jeremiah observed. The visual lesson alone was insufficient—divine interpretation was necessary to understand its meaning. This principle extends to all Scripture: the Holy Spirit must illumine our minds to grasp spiritual truth (1 Cor 2:14, Eph 1:17-18).

The two-part structure—observation then interpretation—models sound hermeneutical method. We observe the text carefully, then seek divine illumination to understand its meaning and application. Human wisdom cannot penetrate spiritual mysteries without the Spirit's teaching (John 16:13). This underscores the Reformed principle that Scripture interprets Scripture, with the Spirit guiding believers into truth.

The imminent interpretation (vv. 6-10) will reveal God's sovereignty over nations, His responsiveness to human choices, and the conditional nature of some prophecies. The potter-clay imagery establishes that God has absolute rights over His creation, yet He exercises those rights in ways that take human responses seriously. This paradox pervades Scripture—divine sovereignty and human responsibility coexist without contradicting each other.

Historical Context

Ancient prophets often received visions or participated in symbolic acts that required subsequent divine interpretation. Dreams needed interpretation (Dan 2, 4), visions required explanation (Ezek 1-3, Rev 1), and symbolic actions demanded commentary (Ezek 4-5). This pattern reflects the principle that divine revelation transcends natural human understanding—God must reveal not only the message but also its meaning.

Questions for Reflection

Related Resources

Explore related topics, people, and study resources to deepen your understanding of this passage.

People