Ezra 10:35
Benaiah, Bedeiah, Chelluh,
Original Language Analysis
Historical Context
These three names continue the Bani family roster begun in verse 34. The absence of genealogical detail suggests the list's primary purpose was confession and accountability rather than administrative record-keeping. In 458 BC post-exilic Judah, Ezra's reform movement demanded public acknowledgment of sin as prerequisite for covenant renewal. Similar to the New Covenant practice of confession (James 5:16, 1 John 1:9), naming ensured transparency and prevented minimizing the offense's severity.
Questions for Reflection
- How does Bedeiah's name ("servant of Yahweh") challenge believers to examine whether their lives demonstrate authentic servanthood or merely religious profession?
- What does the "building" theme (Benaiah) teach about how individual covenant faithfulness or unfaithfulness affects the church community God is building?
- In what ways might contemporary believers undermine God's work of "building" His church through compromising relationships or divided loyalties?
Analysis & Commentary
Benaiah, Bedeiah, Chelluh, This verse continues the list from verse 34, presenting three more names without family designation, likely still from the Bani clan. Benaiah (בְּנָיָה, "Yahweh has built") appears multiple times in these chapters, emphasizing the building/construction theme—God was building a holy people, yet these men undermined that divine architecture through syncretistic marriages. The name's frequency suggests it commemorated the rebuilding after exile.
Bedeiah (בְּדֵיָה, "servant of Yahweh") presents striking irony—true servanthood to Yahweh required covenant obedience, yet Bedeiah served his own desires by taking a foreign wife. Jesus later taught that "no one can serve two masters" (Matthew 6:24)—Bedeiah's attempt to serve Yahweh while marrying outside covenant demonstrates this impossibility. Chelluh (כְּלוּהוּ, possibly "completed" or "perfected") may suggest wholeness or completion, yet his marriage created incompleteness and compromise in the covenant community. The terse, name-only format creates relentless accumulation of evidence against the community's widespread unfaithfulness.