2 Chronicles 20:36

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And he joined himself with him to make ships to go to Tarshish: and they made the ships in Ezion-geber.

Original Language Analysis

וַיְחַבְּרֵ֣הוּ And he joined H2266
וַיְחַבְּרֵ֣הוּ And he joined
Strong's: H2266
Word #: 1 of 10
to join (literally or figuratively); specifically (by means of spells) to fascinate
עִמּ֔וֹ H5973
עִמּ֔וֹ
Strong's: H5973
Word #: 2 of 10
adverb or preposition, with (i.e., in conjunction with), in varied applications; specifically, equally with; often with prepositional prefix (and then
וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ and they made H6213
וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ and they made
Strong's: H6213
Word #: 3 of 10
to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application
אֳנִיּ֖וֹת ships H591
אֳנִיּ֖וֹת ships
Strong's: H591
Word #: 4 of 10
a ship
לָלֶ֣כֶת H1980
לָלֶ֣כֶת
Strong's: H1980
Word #: 5 of 10
to walk (in a great variety of applications, literally and figuratively)
תַּרְשִׁ֑ישׁ to Tarshish H8659
תַּרְשִׁ֑ישׁ to Tarshish
Strong's: H8659
Word #: 6 of 10
tarshish, a place on the mediterranean, hence, the ephithet of a merchant vessel (as if for or from that port); also the name of a persian and of an i
וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ and they made H6213
וַיַּֽעֲשׂ֥וּ and they made
Strong's: H6213
Word #: 7 of 10
to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest application
אֳנִיּ֖וֹת ships H591
אֳנִיּ֖וֹת ships
Strong's: H591
Word #: 8 of 10
a ship
בְּעֶצְי֥וֹן H0
בְּעֶצְי֥וֹן
Strong's: H0
Word #: 9 of 10
גָּֽבֶר׃ in Eziongeber H6100
גָּֽבֶר׃ in Eziongeber
Strong's: H6100
Word #: 10 of 10
etsjon-geber, a place on the red sea

Analysis & Commentary

And he joined himself with him to make ships to go to Tarshish: and they made the ships in Ezion-geber.

This verse is part of the narrative of Judah's kings, specifically addressing God fights for those who seek Him in crisis. The Chronicler's theological perspective emphasizes immediate divine retribution—kings who seek God prosper, while those who forsake Him face judgment. This pattern provides instruction for the post-exilic community on the conditions for God's blessing.

The account demonstrates God's covenant faithfulness despite human unfaithfulness. Even in judgment, God preserves a remnant and offers restoration through repentance. The repeated cycle of apostasy, judgment, and restoration reveals both human sinfulness and divine mercy. References to the temple, proper worship, and priestly service emphasize the Chronicler's concern for correct religious observance.

Theologically, these accounts point beyond immediate history to God's ultimate purposes through the Davidic line. Despite repeated failures, God preserves David's dynasty, anticipating the perfect King who will reign in righteousness. The pattern of judgment for sin and restoration through repentance prefigures the gospel message of salvation through Christ.

Historical Context

This passage occurs during the divided monarchy period when Judah existed separately from northern Israel. The Chronicler writes from a post-exilic perspective, addressing the restored community in Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile (539 BCE onward). His emphasis on temple worship, proper religious observance, and God's covenant faithfulness speaks directly to the needs of his audience who had just rebuilt the temple and were reestablishing their identity as God's people.

The historical context demonstrates both God's judgment on persistent sin and His readiness to restore those who genuinely repent. The Chronicler omits most northern kingdom material, focusing on Judah and the Davidic line to emphasize God's faithfulness to His covenant promises. Archaeological discoveries from sites like Lachish, Beersheba, and Jerusalem corroborate the biblical accounts of various kings' reigns and building projects.

Understanding the Chronicler's post-exilic perspective is crucial—he's not merely recording history but applying past lessons to his contemporary audience, showing that the same principles of seeking God, maintaining proper worship, and covenant faithfulness that determined blessing or judgment in the past still apply.

Questions for Reflection