1 Chronicles 9:17

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And the porters were, Shallum, and Akkub, and Talmon, and Ahiman, and their brethren: Shallum was the chief;

Original Language Analysis

וְהַשֹּֽׁעֲרִים֙ And the porters H7778
וְהַשֹּֽׁעֲרִים֙ And the porters
Strong's: H7778
Word #: 1 of 8
a janitor
שַׁלּ֖וּם Shallum H7967
שַׁלּ֖וּם Shallum
Strong's: H7967
Word #: 2 of 8
shallum, the name of fourteen israelites
וְעַקּ֔וּב and Akkub H6126
וְעַקּ֔וּב and Akkub
Strong's: H6126
Word #: 3 of 8
akkub, the name of five israelites
וְטַלְמֹ֖ן and Talmon H2929
וְטַלְמֹ֖ן and Talmon
Strong's: H2929
Word #: 4 of 8
talmon, a temple doorkeeper
וַֽאֲחִימָ֑ן and Ahiman H289
וַֽאֲחִימָ֑ן and Ahiman
Strong's: H289
Word #: 5 of 8
achiman, the name of an anakite and of an israelite
וַֽאֲחִיהֶ֥ם and their brethren H251
וַֽאֲחִיהֶ֥ם and their brethren
Strong's: H251
Word #: 6 of 8
a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance [like h0001])
שַׁלּ֖וּם Shallum H7967
שַׁלּ֖וּם Shallum
Strong's: H7967
Word #: 7 of 8
shallum, the name of fourteen israelites
הָרֹֽאשׁ׃ was the chief H7218
הָרֹֽאשׁ׃ was the chief
Strong's: H7218
Word #: 8 of 8
the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itc.)

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Post-exilic restoration community section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term שְׁאֵרִית (she'erit) - remnant is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God preserves faithful remnant.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Post-exilic returnees and Jerusalem's inhabitants. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection