1 Chronicles 5:12

Authorized King James Version

PDF

Joel the chief, and Shapham the next, and Jaanai, and Shaphat in Bashan.

Original Language Analysis

יוֹאֵ֣ל Joel H3100
יוֹאֵ֣ל Joel
Strong's: H3100
Word #: 1 of 7
joel, the name of twelve israelites
הָרֹ֔אשׁ the chief H7218
הָרֹ֔אשׁ the chief
Strong's: H7218
Word #: 2 of 7
the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itc.)
וְשָׁפָ֖ם and Shapham H8223
וְשָׁפָ֖ם and Shapham
Strong's: H8223
Word #: 3 of 7
shapham, an israelite
הַמִּשְׁנֶ֑ה the next H4932
הַמִּשְׁנֶ֑ה the next
Strong's: H4932
Word #: 4 of 7
properly, a repetition, i.e., a duplicate (copy of a document), or a double (in amount); by implication, a second (in order, rank, age, quality or loc
וְיַעְנַ֥י and Jaanai H3285
וְיַעְנַ֥י and Jaanai
Strong's: H3285
Word #: 5 of 7
jaanai, an israelite
וְשָׁפָ֖ט and Shaphat H8202
וְשָׁפָ֖ט and Shaphat
Strong's: H8202
Word #: 6 of 7
shaphat, the name of four israelites
בַּבָּשָֽׁן׃ in Bashan H1316
בַּבָּשָֽׁן׃ in Bashan
Strong's: H1316
Word #: 7 of 7
bashan (often with the article), a region east of the jordan

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Trans-Jordanian tribes and their failures section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term מַעַל (ma'al) - unfaithfulness/treachery is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting Consequences of covenant unfaithfulness.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Trans-Jordanian tribes: Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection