1 Chronicles 4:11

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And Chelub the brother of Shuah begat Mehir, which was the father of Eshton.

Original Language Analysis

וּכְל֥וּב And Chelub H3620
וּכְל֥וּב And Chelub
Strong's: H3620
Word #: 1 of 9
kelub, the name of two israelites
אֲחִֽי the brother H251
אֲחִֽי the brother
Strong's: H251
Word #: 2 of 9
a brother (used in the widest sense of literal relationship and metaphorical affinity or resemblance [like h0001])
שׁוּחָ֖ה of Shuah H7746
שׁוּחָ֖ה of Shuah
Strong's: H7746
Word #: 3 of 9
shuchah, an israelite
הוֹלִ֣יד begat H3205
הוֹלִ֣יד begat
Strong's: H3205
Word #: 4 of 9
to bear young; causatively, to beget; medically, to act as midwife; specifically, to show lineage
אֶת H853
אֶת
Strong's: H853
Word #: 5 of 9
properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)
מְחִ֑יר Mehir H4243
מְחִ֑יר Mehir
Strong's: H4243
Word #: 6 of 9
mechir, an israelite
ה֖וּא H1931
ה֖וּא
Strong's: H1931
Word #: 7 of 9
he (she or it); only expressed when emphatic or without a verb; also (intensively) self, or (especially with the article) the same; sometimes (as demo
אֲבִ֥י which was the father H1
אֲבִ֥י which was the father
Strong's: H1
Word #: 8 of 9
father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application
אֶשְׁתּֽוֹן׃ of Eshton H850
אֶשְׁתּֽוֹן׃ of Eshton
Strong's: H850
Word #: 9 of 9
eshton, an israelite

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Judah's expansion and conquest section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term נַחֲלָה (nachalah) - inheritance is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's faithfulness in land promises.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Genealogies of Judah's clans and territorial expansions. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection