1 Chronicles 1:49

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And when Shaul was dead, Baal-hanan the son of Achbor reigned in his stead.

Original Language Analysis

וַיָּ֖מָת was dead H4191
וַיָּ֖מָת was dead
Strong's: H4191
Word #: 1 of 8
to die (literally or figuratively); causatively, to kill
שָׁא֑וּל And when Shaul H7586
שָׁא֑וּל And when Shaul
Strong's: H7586
Word #: 2 of 8
shaul, the name of an edomite and two israelites
וַיִּמְלֹ֣ךְ reigned H4427
וַיִּמְלֹ֣ךְ reigned
Strong's: H4427
Word #: 3 of 8
to reign; hence (by implication) to take counsel
תַּחְתָּ֔יו H8478
תַּחְתָּ֔יו
Strong's: H8478
Word #: 4 of 8
the bottom (as depressed); only adverbially, below (often with prepositional prefix underneath), in lieu of, etc
בַּ֥עַל H0
בַּ֥עַל
Strong's: H0
Word #: 5 of 8
חָנָ֖ן Baalhanan H1177
חָנָ֖ן Baalhanan
Strong's: H1177
Word #: 6 of 8
baal-chanan, the name of an edomite, also of an israelite
בֶּן the son H1121
בֶּן the son
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 7 of 8
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
עַכְבּֽוֹר׃ of Achbor H5907
עַכְבּֽוֹר׃ of Achbor
Strong's: H5907
Word #: 8 of 8
akbor, the name of an idumaean and of two israelites

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Primeval and patriarchal genealogies section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term תּוֹלְדוֹת (toledot) - generations is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's sovereign plan through chosen lineage.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Genealogies from Adam to Edom - establishing covenant continuity. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection