1 Chronicles 1:29

Authorized King James Version

PDF

These are their generations: The firstborn of Ishmael, Nebaioth; then Kedar, and Adbeel, and Mibsam,

Original Language Analysis

אֵ֖לֶּה H428
אֵ֖לֶּה
Strong's: H428
Word #: 1 of 8
these or those
תֹּֽלְדוֹתָ֑ם These are their generations H8435
תֹּֽלְדוֹתָ֑ם These are their generations
Strong's: H8435
Word #: 2 of 8
(plural only) descent, i.e., family; (figuratively) history
בְּכ֤וֹר The firstborn H1060
בְּכ֤וֹר The firstborn
Strong's: H1060
Word #: 3 of 8
first-born; hence, chief
יִשְׁמָעֵאל֙ of Ishmael H3458
יִשְׁמָעֵאל֙ of Ishmael
Strong's: H3458
Word #: 4 of 8
jishmael, the name of abraham's oldest son, and of five israelites
נְבָי֔וֹת Nebaioth H5032
נְבָי֔וֹת Nebaioth
Strong's: H5032
Word #: 5 of 8
nebajoth, a son of ismael, and the country settled by him
וְקֵדָ֥ר then Kedar H6938
וְקֵדָ֥ר then Kedar
Strong's: H6938
Word #: 6 of 8
kedar, a son of ishmael; also (collectively) bedouin (as his descendants or representatives)
וְאַדְבְּאֵ֖ל and Adbeel H110
וְאַדְבְּאֵ֖ל and Adbeel
Strong's: H110
Word #: 7 of 8
adbeel, a son of ishmael
וּמִבְשָֽׂם׃ and Mibsam H4017
וּמִבְשָֽׂם׃ and Mibsam
Strong's: H4017
Word #: 8 of 8
mibsam, the name of an ishmaelite and of an israelite

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Primeval and patriarchal genealogies section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term תּוֹלְדוֹת (toledot) - generations is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's sovereign plan through chosen lineage.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Genealogies from Adam to Edom - establishing covenant continuity. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection